tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4333078797879411990.post5665268945110982027..comments2023-10-28T06:17:52.321-04:00Comments on Apple's Tree: William Mullis vs. Elizabeth Doughty 1842Charley "Apple" Grabowskihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07193646109965731249noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4333078797879411990.post-16339840603776884182009-08-02T15:35:32.439-04:002009-08-02T15:35:32.439-04:00Patti,
Thank you very much! I hadn't looked i...Patti,<br /><br />Thank you very much! I hadn't looked it up but I did wonder why the charge wasn't libel or slander.Charley "Apple" Grabowskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07193646109965731249noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4333078797879411990.post-68010925090095665642009-08-02T11:03:43.873-04:002009-08-02T11:03:43.873-04:00Apple....
I saw a link to your blog from another ...Apple....<br /><br />I saw a link to your blog from another I read and was reading through this with interest when a part of your case popped out at me. I don't know how much research you did into the legal terminology used in this case but I've been forced to with a case of my own. I thought I'd pass a tidbit of knowledge along for you and if you know it already, then my apologies in advance! :)<br /><br />The charge of "Trespass On The Case" has a meaning slightly different from what trespass (basically physical violation of property and/or person) itself means. For a lengthier explanation, please see my blog entry about it at:<br /><br />http://consanguinitatem.blogspot.com/2009/05/browning-v-beck-pt-2-another-charge-is.html<br /><br />since it's easier to refer you to the post than it is to type it all out again!<br /><br />I hope I've helped!Patti Browninghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16071347657188818481noreply@blogger.com